<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>4chan Stories - propnews.co.uk</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propnews.co.uk/tag/4chan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Property Market Insights, Real Estate Trends &#38; UK Housing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>4chan: UK Fines  for Online Safety Violations</title>
		<link>https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-uk-fines-for-online-safety-violations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Langford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online safety]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-uk-fines-for-online-safety-violations/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-320x180.webp 320w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1.webp 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />4chan has been fined by Ofcom for not implementing necessary age checks and risk assessments, raising concerns about online safety.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-uk-fines-for-online-safety-violations/">4chan: UK Fines  for Online Safety Violations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk">propnews.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-320x180.webp 320w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1.webp 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-1024x576.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1-320x180.webp 320w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-1.webp 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><h2></h2>
<p>&#8220;Companies &#8211; wherever they&#8217;re based &#8211; are not allowed to sell unsafe toys to children in the UK,&#8221; stated Suzanne Cater, a representative from Ofcom, emphasizing the importance of online safety regulations. This statement comes as 4chan, the controversial online platform, faces hefty fines totaling £450,000 for failing to implement essential age checks and risk assessments.</p>
<p>Ofcom&#8217;s investigation into 4chan began in June 2025, following numerous complaints regarding illegal activities on the site. The UK&#8217;s Online Safety Act, which came into force on July 25, 2025, mandates that platforms must protect users, particularly minors, from harmful content. However, 4chan has struggled to comply with these regulations.</p>
<p>In addition to the £450,000 fine, 4chan was hit with an extra £50,000 for not assessing the risk of users encountering illegal material. Furthermore, the platform was fined £20,000 for failing to clarify in its terms of service how users are protected from such content. These penalties reflect Ofcom&#8217;s commitment to enforcing online safety standards.</p>
<p>&#8220;The digital world should be no different,&#8221; Cater added, reinforcing the notion that online platforms must adhere to the same safety standards as physical products. Age checks and risk assessments are cornerstones of UK laws, and Ofcom has vowed to take robust enforcement action against companies that fall short.</p>
<p>4chan is now under pressure to implement age assurance by April 2, 2026, or face a daily penalty of £500. This follows a history of non-compliance, as the platform has not yet paid £26,000 in penalties imposed by Ofcom from the previous October. Ofcom retains the right to recover unpaid fines through the courts, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.</p>
<p>As the UK sets new standards for online safety, the community watches closely to see how 4chan will respond to these challenges. The platform&#8217;s future hinges on its ability to adapt to these regulations and ensure the safety of its users.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-uk-fines-for-online-safety-violations/">4chan: UK Fines  for Online Safety Violations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk">propnews.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Langford]]></dc:creator>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>4chan Faces £450,000 Fine in the UK for Safety Violations</title>
		<link>https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-faces-ps450-000-fine-in-the-uk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Langford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-faces-ps450-000-fine-in-the-uk/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-320x180.webp 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />4chan has been penalized by Ofcom for not having age checks in place, highlighting the importance of online safety for children.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-faces-ps450-000-fine-in-the-uk/">4chan Faces £450,000 Fine in the UK for Safety Violations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk">propnews.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-320x180.webp 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><img width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="4chan — GB news" style="display:block; margin-bottom:15px; max-width:100%;" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp.webp 1024w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-300x169.webp 300w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-768x432.webp 768w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-440x248.webp 440w, https://www.propnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/4chan_base_wp-320x180.webp 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><h2></h2>
<p>&#8220;Companies &#8211; wherever they&#8217;re based &#8211; are not allowed to sell unsafe toys to children in the UK,&#8221; stated Suzanne Cater, a representative from Ofcom, emphasizing the need for stringent regulations in the digital landscape. This statement comes as 4chan, a popular online platform, faces serious scrutiny for failing to protect its younger users from harmful content.</p>
<p>Ofcom has imposed a hefty fine of £450,000 on 4chan for not implementing age checks that would prevent children from accessing pornography on its site. This decision reflects the growing concern over the safety of minors in online environments, particularly in light of the UK Online Safety Act, which mandates platforms to take down illegal and harmful content.</p>
<p>In addition to the initial fine, 4chan has been penalized with an extra £50,000 for not assessing the risk of users encountering illegal material. Furthermore, the platform faces a £20,000 fine for failing to clarify in its terms of service how it protects users from illegal content. These penalties underscore the importance of accountability in the digital space.</p>
<p>Ofcom&#8217;s investigation into 4chan began last June after receiving complaints regarding illegal activities on the site. The regulator&#8217;s actions are part of a broader effort to ensure that online platforms adhere to safety standards that protect vulnerable users.</p>
<p>&#8220;The digital world should be no different,&#8221; Cater added, reinforcing the notion that online safety regulations are just as crucial as those governing physical products. Age checks and risk assessments are seen as cornerstones of these laws, and Ofcom has vowed to take robust enforcement action against firms that do not comply.</p>
<p>4chan is now required to implement age assurance measures and conduct a risk assessment by April 2, or it will face daily penalties of £200. This is a critical deadline for the platform, which has already accumulated £26,000 in unpaid penalties from previous violations.</p>
<p>Ofcom has the authority to pursue recovery of these unpaid fines through the courts, highlighting the seriousness of the situation. The ongoing scrutiny of 4chan serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with operating an online platform, especially one that attracts a diverse user base.</p>
<p>As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the need for effective regulations to protect children online remains paramount. The actions taken against 4chan may set a precedent for how other platforms handle similar issues in the future.</p>
<p>Details remain unconfirmed regarding 4chan&#8217;s plans to address these fines and implement the necessary changes. The community watches closely as this situation develops, hoping for a safer online environment for all users.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk/4chan-faces-ps450-000-fine-in-the-uk/">4chan Faces £450,000 Fine in the UK for Safety Violations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.propnews.co.uk">propnews.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Langford]]></dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
